↓ Skip to main content

Systemic Regulation of Intestinal Iron Absorption

Overview of attention for article published in IUBMB Life, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic Regulation of Intestinal Iron Absorption
Published in
IUBMB Life, January 2008
DOI 10.1080/15216540500149904
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teresa M. Steele, David M. Frazer, Gregory J. Anderson

Abstract

The intestinal absorption of the essential trace element iron and its mobilization from storage sites in the body are controlled by systemic signals that reflect tissue iron requirements. Recent advances have indicated that the liver-derived peptide hepcidin plays a central role in this process by repressing iron release from intestinal enterocytes, macrophages and other body cells. When iron requirements are increased, hepcidin levels decline and more iron enters the plasma. It has been proposed that the level of circulating diferric transferrin, which reflects tissue iron levels, acts as a signal to alter hepcidin expression. In the liver, the proteins HFE, transferrin receptor 2 and hemojuvelin may be involved in mediating this signal as disruption of each of these molecules decreases hepcidin expression. Patients carrying mutations in these molecules or in hepcidin itself develop systemic iron loading (or hemochromatosis) due to their inability to down regulate iron absorption. Hepcidin is also responsible for the decreased plasma iron or hypoferremia that accompanies inflammation and various chronic diseases as its expression is stimulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6. The mechanisms underlying the regulation of hepcidin expression and how it acts on cells to control iron release are key areas of ongoing research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from IUBMB Life
#1,139
of 1,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,259
of 168,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IUBMB Life
#430
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.