You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of function and clinical utility of alcohol and other drug web sites: An observational, qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frances J Kay-Lambkin, Angela White, Amanda L Baker, David J Kavanagh, Britt Klein, Judith Proudfoot, Judy Drennan, Jason Connor, Ross M Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#5,843,730
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,977
of 14,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,864
of 110,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#60
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.