↓ Skip to main content

Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes

Overview of attention for article published in Water Research, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
606 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
761 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes
Published in
Water Research, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Le-Minh, S.J. Khan, J.E. Drewes, R.M. Stuetz

Abstract

Municipal water recycling processes are potential human and environmental exposure routes for low concentrations of persistent antibiotics. While the implications of such exposure scenarios are unknown, concerns have been raised regarding the possibility that continuous discharge of antibiotics to the environment may facilitate the development or proliferation of resistant strains of bacteria. As potable and non-potable water recycling schemes are continuously developed, it is imperative to improve our understanding of the fate of antibiotics during conventional and advanced wastewater treatment processes leading to high-quality water reclamation. This review collates existing knowledge with the aim of providing new insight to the influence of a wide range of treatment processes to the ultimate fate of antibiotics during conventional and advanced wastewater treatment. Although conventional biological wastewater treatment processes are effective for the removal of some antibiotics, many have been reported to occur at 10-1000 ng L(-1) concentrations in secondary treated effluents. These include beta-lactams, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines. Tertiary and advanced treatment processes may be required to fully manage environmental and human exposure to these contaminants in water recycling schemes. The effectiveness of a range of processes including tertiary media filtration, ozonation, chlorination, UV irradiation, activated carbon adsorption, and NF/RO filtration has been reviewed and, where possible, semi-quantitative estimations of antibiotics removals have been provided.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 761 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Estonia 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 737 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 163 21%
Student > Master 127 17%
Researcher 93 12%
Student > Bachelor 59 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 7%
Other 123 16%
Unknown 142 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 155 20%
Engineering 130 17%
Chemistry 101 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 8%
Chemical Engineering 34 4%
Other 89 12%
Unknown 190 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,669,187
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Water Research
#320
of 11,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,507
of 104,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.