↓ Skip to main content

Risk should be objectively defined: reply to Zentall and Smith

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Risk should be objectively defined: reply to Zentall and Smith
Published in
Animal Cognition, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10071-015-0859-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cédric Sueur, Marie Pelé

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 24%
Engineering 3 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#13,429,828
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,098
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,791
of 261,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.