You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of dose on the antimalarial efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine: a systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(15)70024-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network AL Dose Impact Study Group |
| Abstract |
Artemether-lumefantrine is the most widely used artemisinin-based combination therapy for malaria, although treatment failures occur in some regions. We investigated the effect of dosing strategy on efficacy in a pooled analysis from trials done in a wide range of malaria-endemic settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 16% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 23% |
| Unknown | 35 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#5,170,547
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#3,492
of 6,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,227
of 278,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#60
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.