↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic gold, silver, and platinum nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic gold, silver, and platinum nanoparticles
Published in
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/wnan.1322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miko Yamada, Matthew Foote, Tarl W. Prow

Abstract

There are an abundance of nanoparticle technologies being developed for use as part of therapeutic strategies. This review focuses on a narrow class of metal nanoparticles that have therapeutic potential that is a consequence of elemental composition and size. The most widely known of these are gold nanoshells that have been developed over the last two decades for photothermal ablation in superficial cancers. The therapeutic effect is the outcome of the thickness and diameter of the gold shell that enables fine tuning of the plasmon resonance. When these metal nanoparticles are exposed to the relevant wavelength of light, their temperature rapidly increases. This in turn induces a localized photothermal ablation that kills the surrounding tumor tissue. Similarly, gold nanoparticles have been developed to enhance radiotherapy. The high-Z nature of gold dramatically increases the photoelectric cross-section. Thus, the photoelectric effects are significantly increased. The outcome of these interactions is enhanced tumor killing with lower doses of radiation, all while sparing tissue without gold nanoparticles. Silver nanoparticles have been used for their wound healing properties in addition to enhancing the tumor-killing effects of anticancer drugs. Finally, platinum nanoparticles are thought to serve as a reservoir for platinum ions that can induce DNA damage in cancer cells. The future is bright with the path to clinical trials is largely cleared for some of the less complex therapeutic metal nanoparticle systems. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 344 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 23%
Student > Master 61 17%
Researcher 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 75 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 56 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 9%
Physics and Astronomy 24 7%
Materials Science 23 7%
Other 83 24%
Unknown 103 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
#356
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,516
of 347,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.