You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Production and packaging of a biological arsenal: Evolution of centipede venoms under morphological constraint
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1424068112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eivind A B Undheim, Brett R Hamilton, Nyoman D Kurniawan, Greg Bowlay, Bronwen W Cribb, David J Merritt, Bryan G Fry, Glenn F King, Deon J Venter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 21% |
| Morocco | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 46% |
| Scientists | 13 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,234,823
of 25,470,300 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#26,545
of 103,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,137
of 278,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#439
of 1,016 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,470,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,016 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.