↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the Sea Urchin Neuropeptide Landscape by Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the Sea Urchin Neuropeptide Landscape by Mass Spectrometry
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13361-018-1898-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric B. Monroe, Suresh P. Annangudi, Andinet A. Wadhams, Timothy A. Richmond, Ning Yang, Bruce R. Southey, Elena V. Romanova, Liliane Schoofs, Geert Baggerman, Jonathan V. Sweedler

Abstract

Neuropeptides are essential cell-to-cell signaling messengers and serve important regulatory roles in animals. Although remarkable progress has been made in peptide identification across the Metazoa, for some phyla such as Echinodermata, limited neuropeptides are known and even fewer have been verified on the protein level. We employed peptidomic approaches using bioinformatics and mass spectrometry (MS) to experimentally confirm 23 prohormones and to characterize a new prohormone in nervous system tissue from Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, the purple sea urchin. Ninety-three distinct peptides from known and novel prohormones were detected with MS from extracts of the radial nerves, many of which are reported or experimentally confirmed here for the first time, representing a large-scale study of neuropeptides from the phylum Echinodermata. Many of the identified peptides and their precursor proteins have low homology to known prohormones from other species/phyla and are unique to the sea urchin. By pairing bioinformatics with MS, the capacity to characterize novel peptides and annotate prohormone genes is enhanced. Graphical Abstract.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#3,086
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,007
of 340,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#64
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.