↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol for a multicenter prospective controlled and randomized trial of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Colorectal Disease, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Study protocol for a multicenter prospective controlled and randomized trial of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00384-018-2996-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

X. Serra-Aracil, A. Zárate, L. Mora, S. Serra-Pla, A. Pallisera, J. Bonfill, J. Bargalló, A. Pando, S. Delgado, E. Balleteros, C. Pericay

Abstract

Compared with the open approach, laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) achieves faster patient recovery, reduces morbidity rates, and shortens hospital stay. However, in laparoscopic low anterior resection (L-LAR), conversion to open surgery is required in almost 20% of cases. Transanal TME (Ta-TME) combined with laparoscopy, also called hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), is a less invasive procedure that can overcome some of the limitations of laparoscopic rectal surgery. In this study, we aim to determine whether Ta-TME has a lower rate of conversion to open surgery than L-LAR, and thus achieves faster patient recovery without altering the pathological, functional, or oncological results. The main objective is to compare the results for conversion to open surgery between Ta-TME and L-LAR. Multicenter, prospective randomized controlled study of patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma who will be randomly allocated to Ta-TME or L-LAR groups after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main endpoint is conversion to open surgery and the secondary endpoints are general morbidity and mortality and hospital stay. Demographic, surgical, and pathological variables will also be studied, along with quality of life and survival. A sample size of 53 patients per group is calculated. With an estimated loss of 10%, the final sample required will be 116 patients. Ta-TME achieves a lower conversion rate to open surgery than L-LAR, thus improving patient recovery and reducing overall morbidity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02550769. Registration no. Ethical and Clinical Research Committee, Parc Taulí University Hospital: ID 2014/064.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 21 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Unknown 23 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,934,075
of 23,653,937 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#1,064
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,857
of 334,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#25
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,653,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.