| Title |
Breaking Through Disciplinary Barriers: Human–Wildlife Interactions and Multispecies Ethnography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10764-018-0027-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah E. Parathian, Matthew R. McLennan, Catherine M. Hill, Amélia Frazão-Moreira, Kimberley J. Hockings |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 19% |
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 26 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 52% |
| Scientists | 21 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 241 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 18% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 37 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 15 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 69 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,282,087
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#67
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,545
of 344,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.