↓ Skip to main content

Risk factor analysis of recanalization and retreatment for patients with endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery bifurcation aneurysms

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Risk factor analysis of recanalization and retreatment for patients with endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery bifurcation aneurysms
Published in
Neuroradiology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00234-018-2013-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seung Pil Ban, Gyojun Hwang, Chang Hyeun Kim, Hyoung Soo Byoun, Si Un Lee, Tackeun Kim, Jae Seung Bang, Chang Wan Oh, O-Ki Kwon

Abstract

Only a few reports of internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation aneurysms using the endovascular technique have been published in the current literature. The purpose of this study was to assess how multiple risk factors including angioarchitectural features of ICA bifurcation characteristics may have influenced aneurysmal rupture, recanalization, and retreatment. Fifty-one patients with 52 ICA bifurcation aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling between July 2003 and July 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients' clinical records, endovascular reports, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were reviewed. We also evaluated risk factors for recanalization and retreatment, including the angioarchitectural anatomy. The clinical outcomes were observed to be satisfactory in 49 patients (96.0%) and unfavorable in 2 patients (4.0%). The risk factor for aneurysmal rupture was young age (P = 0.024). Symptomatic complications due to thromboembolism occurred in 1.9% of cases; no patients suffered a fatal complication. Eleven of 52 ICA bifurcation aneurysms (21.2%) were recanalized within an average of 54.3 ± 33.5 months of follow-up. Among the aneurysms, 4 (7.7%) underwent recoiling. Multivariate analysis showed that ruptured aneurysms (P = 0.006) and a lower packing density (P = 0.048) were risk factors for recanalization. A lower packing density was the only risk factor for retreatment (P = 0.019). Endovascular treatment of ICA bifurcation aneurysms is considered safe and acceptable. This study showed that the ICA bifurcation aneurysms ruptured more frequently at a younger age. A higher packing density has been shown to reduce major recanalization and retreatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 28%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 11 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,481,952
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#1,085
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,716
of 331,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.