| Title |
Can mosses serve as model organisms for forest research?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-015-0468-7 |
| Authors |
Stefanie J. Müller, Desirée D. Gütle, Jean-Pierre Jacquot, Ralf Reski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 30% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Finland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,320,280
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#469
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,613
of 292,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.