↓ Skip to main content

RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosome Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
RZZ and Mad1 dynamics in Drosophila mitosis
Published in
Chromosome Research, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10577-015-9472-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lénaïg Défachelles, Natacha Raich, Régine Terracol, Xavier Baudin, Byron Williams, Michael Goldberg, Roger E. Karess

Abstract

The presence or absence of Mad1 at kinetochores is a major determinant of spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) activity, the surveillance mechanism that delays anaphase onset if one or more kinetochores remain unattached to spindle fibers. Among the factors regulating the levels of Mad1 at kinetochores is the Rod, Zw10, and Zwilch (RZZ) complex, which is required for Mad1 recruitment through a mechanism that remains unknown. The relative dynamics and interactions of Mad1 and RZZ at kinetochores have not been extensively investigated, although Mad1 has been reported to be stably recruited to unattached kinetochores. In this study, we directly compare Mad1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) turnover dynamics on unattached Drosophila kinetochores with that of RZZ, tagged either with GFP-Rod or GFP-Zw10. We find that nearly 40 % of kinetochore-bound Mad1 has a significant dynamic component, turning over with a half-life of 12 s. RZZ in contrast is essentially stable on unattached kinetochores. In addition, we report that a fraction of RZZ and Mad1 can co-immunoprecipitate, indicating that the genetically determined recruitment hierarchy (in which Mad1 depends on RZZ) may reflect a physical association of the two complexes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 29%
Psychology 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Unknown 6 17%