↓ Skip to main content

Telemedicine and Mobile Health Technology Are Effective in the Management of Digestive Diseases: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Telemedicine and Mobile Health Technology Are Effective in the Management of Digestive Diseases: A Systematic Review
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10620-018-5054-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian C. Helsel, Joel E. Williams, Kristen Lawson, Jessica Liang, Jonathan Markowitz

Abstract

Mobile applications and interactive websites are an increasingly used method of telemedicine, but their use lacks evidence in digestive diseases. This study aims to explore digestive disease studies that use telemedicine to effectively manage disease activity, help monitor symptoms, improve compliance to the treatment protocol, increase patient satisfaction, and enhance the patient-to-provider communication. EBSCO, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched using Medical Subject Headings and other keywords to identify studies that utilized telemedicine in patients with digestive disease. The PRISMA guidelines were used to identify 20 research articles that had data aligning with 4 common overlapping themes including, patient compliance (n = 13), patient satisfaction (n = 11), disease activity (n = 15), and quality of life (n = 13). The studies focused on digestive diseases including inflammatory bowel disease (n = 7), ulcerative colitis (n = 4), Crohn's Disease (n = 1), irritable bowel syndrome (n = 6), and colorectal cancer (n = 2). From the studies included in this systematic review, patient compliance and patient satisfaction ranged between 25.7-100% and 74-100%, respectively. Disease activity, measured by symptom severity scales and physiological biomarkers, showed improvements following telemedicine interventions in several, but not all, studies. Similar to disease activity, general and disease-specific quality of life showed improvements following telemedicine interventions in as little as 12 weeks in some studies. Telemedicine and mobile health technology may be effective in managing disease activity and improving quality of life in digestive diseases. Future studies should explore both gastrointestinal and gastroesophageal diseases using these types of interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 78 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 80 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,168,620
of 24,027,644 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#380
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,936
of 300,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#6
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,027,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.