↓ Skip to main content

Validation of qualitative PCR methods on the basis of mathematical–statistical modelling of the probability of detection

Overview of attention for article published in Accreditation and Quality Assurance, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 123)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Validation of qualitative PCR methods on the basis of mathematical–statistical modelling of the probability of detection
Published in
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00769-015-1112-9
Authors

Steffen Uhlig, Kirstin Frost, Bertrand Colson, Kirsten Simon, Dietrich Mäde, Ralf Reiting, Petra Gowik, Lutz Grohmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 38%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Mathematics 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,881,484
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#24
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,581
of 259,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Accreditation and Quality Assurance
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them