↓ Skip to main content

Bisphosphonates and their influence on fracture healing: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Bisphosphonates and their influence on fracture healing: a systematic review
Published in
Osteoporosis International, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00198-014-3007-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Molvik, W. Khan

Abstract

Bisphosphonates are commonly used in osteoporosis, but concerns have been raised about possible negative effects on fracture healing. We systematically reviewed the literature and found that bisphosphonates significantly prolong union times of distal radius fractures but not femoral fractures. The timing of bisphosphonate introduction does not affect fracture union time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,265,887
of 25,352,304 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,559
of 3,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,616
of 364,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#37
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,352,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.