↓ Skip to main content

Consequences of contextual factors on clinical reasoning in resident physicians

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Consequences of contextual factors on clinical reasoning in resident physicians
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10459-015-9597-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elexis McBee, Temple Ratcliffe, Katherine Picho, Anthony R. Artino, Lambert Schuwirth, William Kelly, Jennifer Masel, Cees van der Vleuten, Steven J. Durning

Abstract

Context specificity and the impact that contextual factors have on the complex process of clinical reasoning is poorly understood. Using situated cognition as the theoretical framework, our aim was to evaluate the verbalized clinical reasoning processes of resident physicians in order to describe what impact the presence of contextual factors have on their clinical reasoning. Participants viewed three video recorded clinical encounters portraying straightforward diagnoses in internal medicine with select patient contextual factors modified. After watching each video recording, participants completed a think-aloud protocol. Transcripts from the think-aloud protocols were analyzed using a constant comparative approach. After iterative coding, utterances were analyzed for emergent themes with utterances grouped into categories, themes and subthemes. Ten residents participated in the study with saturation reached during analysis. Participants universally acknowledged the presence of contextual factors in the video recordings. Four categories emerged as a consequence of the contextual factors: (1) emotional reactions (2) behavioral inferences (3) optimizing the doctor patient relationship and (4) difficulty with closure of the clinical encounter. The presence of contextual factors may impact clinical reasoning performance in resident physicians. When confronted with the presence of contextual factors in a clinical scenario, residents experienced difficulty with closure of the encounter, exhibited as diagnostic uncertainty. This finding raises important questions about the relationship between contextual factors and clinical reasoning activities and how this relationship might influence the cost effectiveness of care. This study also provides insight into how the phenomena of context specificity may be explained using situated cognition theory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 11 13%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 30 34%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Psychology 6 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,269,290
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#196
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,239
of 259,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.