| Title |
How to Shape a Better Future? Epistemic Difficulties for Ethical Assessment and Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10677-015-9582-8 |
| Authors |
Brent Daniel Mittelstadt, Bernd Carsten Stahl, N. Ben Fairweather |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 13% |
| Philosophy | 8 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,721,119
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#79
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,598
of 267,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.