↓ Skip to main content

Sustained adrenergic signaling promotes intratumoral innervation through BDNF induction

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sustained adrenergic signaling promotes intratumoral innervation through BDNF induction
Published in
Cancer Research, June 2018
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-1701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie K Allen, Guillermo N Armaiz-Pena, Archana S Nagaraja, Nouara C Sadaoui, Tatiana Ortiz, Robert Dood, Merve Ozcan, Danielle M Herder, Monika Haemmerle, Kshipra M Gharpure, Rajesha Rupaimoole, Rebecca A Previs, Sherry Y Wu, Sunila Pradeep, Xiaoyun Xu, Hee Dong Han, Behrouz Zand, Heather J Dalton, Morgan Taylor, Wei Hu, Justin Bottsford-Miller, Myrthala Moreno-Smith, Yu Kang, Lingegowda S Mangala, Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo, Vasudha Sehgal, Erika L Spaeth, Prahlad T Ram, Stephen T C Wong, Frank C Marini, Gabriel Lopez-Berestein, Steve W Cole, Susan K Lutgendorf, Mariella De Biasi, Anil K Sood

Abstract

Mounting clinical and preclinical evidence supports a key role for sustained adrenergic signaling in the tumor microenvironment as a driver of tumor growth and progression. However, the mechanisms by which adrenergic neurotransmitters are delivered to the tumor microenvironment are not well understood. Here we present evidence for a feedforward loop whereby adrenergic signaling leads to increased tumoral innervation. In response to catecholamines, tumor cells produced brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in an ADRB3/cAMP/Epac/JNK-dependent manner. Elevated BDNF levels in the tumor microenvironment increased innervation by signaling through host neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (TrkB) receptors. In cancer patients, high tumor nerve counts were significantly associated with increased BDNF and norepinephrine levels and decreased overall survival. Collectively, these data describe a novel pathway for tumor innervation with resultant biological and clinical implications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#14,479
of 17,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,775
of 328,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#298
of 452 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.