Title |
Effects of Increased Patient Cost Sharing on Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Care
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-008-0614-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Chernew, Teresa B. Gibson, Kristina Yu-Isenberg, Michael C. Sokol, Allison B. Rosen, A. Mark Fendrick |
Abstract |
Increasing patient cost sharing is a commonly employed mechanism to contain health care expenditures. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 125 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
Researcher | 22 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 15% |
Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 28% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,002,349
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,543
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,852
of 81,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.