↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to improve cultural competency in health care for Indigenous peoples of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Quality in Health Care, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to improve cultural competency in health care for Indigenous peoples of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA: a systematic review
Published in
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, March 2015
DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzv010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anton Clifford, Janya McCalman, Roxanne Bainbridge, Komla Tsey

Abstract

This article describes the characteristics and reviews the methodological quality of interventions designed to improve cultural competency in health care for Indigenous peoples of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 302 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 17%
Student > Bachelor 43 14%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Other 17 6%
Other 65 21%
Unknown 70 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 60 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 18%
Social Sciences 48 16%
Psychology 15 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 79 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,536,601
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#436
of 1,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,432
of 274,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.