↓ Skip to main content

Cues from the reef: olfactory preferences of a symbiotically luminous cardinalfish

Overview of attention for article published in Coral Reefs, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Cues from the reef: olfactory preferences of a symbiotically luminous cardinalfish
Published in
Coral Reefs, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00338-015-1278-y
Authors

Alison L. Gould, Saki Harii, Paul V. Dunlap

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 39%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,196,575
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#1,633
of 1,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,331
of 291,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#25
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.