↓ Skip to main content

Somatically mutated tumor antigens in the quest for a more efficacious patient-oriented immunotherapy of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Somatically mutated tumor antigens in the quest for a more efficacious patient-oriented immunotherapy of cancer
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00262-014-1599-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zlatko Trajanoski, Cristina Maccalli, Daniele Mennonna, Giulia Casorati, Giorgio Parmiani, Paolo Dellabona

Abstract

Although cancer immunotherapy shows efficacy with adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) and antibody-based immune checkpoint blockade, efficacious therapeutic vaccination of cancer patients with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) remains largely unmet. Current cancer vaccines utilize nonmutated shared TAAs that may have suboptimal immunogenicity. Experimental evidence underscores the strong immunogenicity of unique TAAs derived from somatically mutated cancer proteins, whose massive characterization has been precluded until recently by technical limitations. The development of cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing approaches makes now possible the rapid identification of all the somatic mutations contained in a cancer cell genome. This method, combined with robust bioinformatics platforms for T cell epitope prediction and established reverse immunology approaches, provides us with an integrated strategy to identify patient-specific unique TAAs in a relatively short time, compatible with their potential use in the clinic. Hence, it is now for the first time possible to quantitatively define the patient's unique tumor antigenome and exploit it for vaccination, possibly in combination with ACT and/or immune checkpoint blockade to further increase immunotherapy efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Taiwan 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,673,538
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#928
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,002
of 237,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.