↓ Skip to main content

Thriving in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
Title
Thriving in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2412-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan A. Weiss, Priscilla Burnham Riosa

Abstract

Most research on mental health in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID) has focused on deficits. We examined individual (i.e., sociocommunicative skills, adaptive behavior, functional cognitive skills) and contextual (i.e., home, school, and community participation) correlates of thriving in 330 youth with ID and ASD compared to youth with ID only, 11-22 years of age (M = 16.74, SD = 2.95). Youth with ASD and ID were reported to thrive less than peers with ID only. Group differences in sociocommunicative ability and school participation mediated the relationship between ASD and less thriving. Research is needed to further elucidate a developmental-contextual framework that can inform interventions to promote mental health and wellness in individuals with ASD and ID.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 269 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 17%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 11%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 68 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 28%
Social Sciences 41 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 79 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,920,564
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#788
of 5,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,173
of 281,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.