↓ Skip to main content

Breastfeeding, Maternal Education and Cognitive Function: A Prospective Study in Twins

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Breastfeeding, Maternal Education and Cognitive Function: A Prospective Study in Twins
Published in
Behavior Genetics, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10519-009-9293-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Bartels, C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt, D. I. Boomsma

Abstract

The effect of breastfeeding on cognitive abilities is examined in the offspring of highly educated women and compared to the effects in women with low or middle educational attainment. All offspring consisted of 12-year old mono- or dizygotic twins and this made it possible to study the effect of breastfeeding on mean cognition scores as well as the moderating effects of breastfeeding on the heritability of variation in cognition. Information on breastfeeding and cognitive ability was available for 6,569 children. Breastfeeding status was prospectively assessed in the first years after birth of the children. Maternal education is positively associated with performance on a standardized test for cognitive ability in offspring. A significant effect of breastfeeding on cognition was also observed. The effect was similar for offspring with mothers with a high, middle, and low educational level. Breast-fed children of highly educated mothers score on average 7.6 point higher on a standardized test of cognitive abilities (CITO test; range 500–550; effects size = .936) than formula-fed children of mothers with a low education. Individual differences in cognition scores are largely accounted for by additive genetic factors (80%) and breastfeeding does not modify the effect of genetic factors in any of the three strata of maternal education. Heritability was slightly lower in children with a mother with a middle-level education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 24%
Psychology 19 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,327,280
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#647
of 910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,104
of 110,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.