Title |
Whale sharks target dense prey patches of sergestid shrimp off Tanzania
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Plankton Research, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1093/plankt/fbv010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christoph A. Rohner, Amelia J. Armstrong, Simon J. Pierce, Clare E. M. Prebble, E. Fernando Cagua, Jesse E. M. Cochran, Michael L. Berumen, Anthony J. Richardson |
Abstract |
Large planktivores require high-density prey patches to make feeding energetically viable. This is a major challenge for species living in tropical and subtropical seas, such as whale sharks Rhincodon typus. Here, we characterize zooplankton biomass, size structure and taxonomic composition from whale shark feeding events and background samples at Mafia Island, Tanzania. The majority of whale sharks were feeding (73%, 380 of 524 observations), with the most common behaviour being active surface feeding (87%). We used 20 samples collected from immediately adjacent to feeding sharks and an additional 202 background samples for comparison to show that plankton biomass was ∼10 times higher in patches where whale sharks were feeding (25 vs. 2.6 mg m(-3)). Taxonomic analyses of samples showed that the large sergestid Lucifer hanseni (∼10 mm) dominated while sharks were feeding, accounting for ∼50% of identified items, while copepods (<2 mm) dominated background samples. The size structure was skewed towards larger animals representative of L.hanseni in feeding samples. Thus, whale sharks at Mafia Island target patches of dense, large, zooplankton dominated by sergestids. Large planktivores, such as whale sharks, which generally inhabit warm oligotrophic waters, aggregate in areas where they can feed on dense prey to obtain sufficient energy. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 12% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
India | 1 | 6% |
New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 6% |
Belgium | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 23% |