↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Qing (Positive Emotions) and Li1 (Rationality) in Chinese Entrepreneurial Decision Making: A Confucian Ren-Yi Wisdom Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Qing (Positive Emotions) and Li1 (Rationality) in Chinese Entrepreneurial Decision Making: A Confucian Ren-Yi Wisdom Perspective
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1970-1
Authors

Yunxia Zhu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Lecturer 11 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 55 45%
Psychology 11 9%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,327,280
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,083
of 2,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,604
of 306,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.