↓ Skip to main content

Impact of inadequate adherence on response to subcutaneously administered anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs: results from the Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis Genetics and Genomics Study Syndicate…

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of inadequate adherence on response to subcutaneously administered anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs: results from the Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis Genetics and Genomics Study Syndicate cohort
Published in
Rheumatology, September 2014
DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/keu358
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Bluett, Catharine Morgan, Layla Thurston, Darren Plant, Kimme L. Hyrich, Ann W. Morgan, Anthony G. Wilson, John D. Isaacs, Lis Cordingley, Anne Barton

Abstract

Non-adherence to DMARDs is common, but little is known about adherence to biologic therapies and its relationship to treatment response. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between self-reported non-adherence to s.c. anti-TNF therapy and response in individuals with RA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 13%
Psychology 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 40 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,782,397
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#1,119
of 7,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,914
of 250,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#10
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.