You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of inadequate adherence on response to subcutaneously administered anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs: results from the Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis Genetics and Genomics Study Syndicate cohort
|
---|---|
Published in |
Rheumatology, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1093/rheumatology/keu358 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James Bluett, Catharine Morgan, Layla Thurston, Darren Plant, Kimme L. Hyrich, Ann W. Morgan, Anthony G. Wilson, John D. Isaacs, Lis Cordingley, Anne Barton |
Abstract |
Non-adherence to DMARDs is common, but little is known about adherence to biologic therapies and its relationship to treatment response. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between self-reported non-adherence to s.c. anti-TNF therapy and response in individuals with RA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Researcher | 13 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 21% |
Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 33% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 13% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 40 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,782,397
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#1,119
of 7,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,914
of 250,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#10
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.