↓ Skip to main content

Using integrated population modelling to quantify the implications of multiple threatening processes for a rapidly declining population

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using integrated population modelling to quantify the implications of multiple threatening processes for a rapidly declining population
Published in
Biological Conservation, March 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.027
Authors

Jonathan R. Rhodes, Chooi Fei Ng, Deidré L. de Villiers, Harriet J. Preece, Clive A. McAlpine, Hugh P. Possingham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 5 2%
Brazil 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 218 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 17%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 15 6%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 41 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 42%
Environmental Science 58 25%
Engineering 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 49 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,691
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,236
of 120,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.