↓ Skip to main content

Chronic management and health supervision of individuals with propionic acidemia

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics & Metabolism, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic management and health supervision of individuals with propionic acidemia
Published in
Molecular Genetics & Metabolism, September 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.034
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. Reid Sutton, Kimberly A. Chapman, Andrea L. Gropman, Erin MacLeod, Kathy Stagni, Marshall L. Summar, Keiko Ueda, Nicholas Ah Mew, Jill Franks, Eddie Island, Dietrich Matern, Loren Peña, Brittany Smith, Tina Urv, Charles Venditti, Anupam Chakarapani

Abstract

Propionic acidemia is a relatively rare inborn error of metabolism. Individuals with propionic acidemia often have life-threatening episodes of hyperammonemia and metabolic acidosis, as well as intellectual disability. There are many reports of additional problems, including poor growth, stroke-like episodes of the basal ganglia, seizures, cardiomyopathy, long QTc syndrome, immune defects, pancreatitis and optic neuropathy; however, there is little information about the incidence of these problems in this rare disease. Additionally, there are no clear guidelines for medical or surgical management of individuals with propionic acidemia. Through a comprehensive and systematic review of the current medical literature and survey of expert opinion, we have developed practice guidelines for the chronic management of individuals with propionic acidemia, including dietary therapy, use of medications, laboratory monitoring, chronic health supervision, use of gastrostomy tubes and liver transplantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Other 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 28 26%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Chemistry 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics & Metabolism
#1,787
of 2,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,231
of 137,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics & Metabolism
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.