You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62233-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicki Flenady, Laura Koopmans, Philippa Middleton, J Frederik Frøen, Gordon C Smith, Kristen Gibbons, Michael Coory, Adrienne Gordon, David Ellwood, Harold David McIntyre, Ruth Fretts, Majid Ezzati |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 858 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 839 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 114 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 109 | 13% |
| Researcher | 97 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 97 | 11% |
| Other | 62 | 7% |
| Other | 181 | 21% |
| Unknown | 198 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 370 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 2% |
| Other | 101 | 12% |
| Unknown | 235 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#577,890
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#5,190
of 43,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,936
of 125,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#15
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.