| Title |
Lack of association between obesity and aggressiveness of differentiated thyroid cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40618-018-0889-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Grani, L. Lamartina, T. Montesano, G. Ronga, V. Maggisano, R. Falcone, V. Ramundo, L. Giacomelli, C. Durante, D. Russo, M. Maranghi |
| Abstract |
Aim of this study was to evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and aggressive features of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in a prospective cohort. Patients with DTC were prospectively enrolled at a tertiary referral center and grouped according to their BMI. Aggressive clinic-pathological features were analyzed following the American Thyroid Association Initial Risk Stratification System score. The cohort was composed of 432 patients: 5 (1.2%) were underweight, 187 (43.3%) normal weight, 154 (35.6%) overweight, 68 (15.7%) grade 1 obese, 11 (2.5%) grade 2 obese and 7 (1.6%) grade 3 obese. No single feature of advanced thyroid cancer was more frequent in obese patients than in others. No significant correlation was found between BMI, primary tumor size (Spearman's ρ - 0.02; p = 0.71) and ATA Initial Risk Stratification System score (ρ 0.03; p = 0.49), after adjustment for age. According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, male gender and pre-surgical diagnosis of cancer were significant predictors of cancer with high or intermediate-high recurrence risk according to the ATA system (OR 2.06 and 2.51, respectively), while older age at diagnosis was a protective factor (OR 0.98), and BMI was not a predictor. BMI was a predictor of microscopic extrathyroidal extension only (OR 1.06). Obesity was not associated with aggressive features in this prospective, European cohort of patients with DTC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 42% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#1,012
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,999
of 340,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.