↓ Skip to main content

A Meta-analysis of Gene Expression Signatures of Blood Pressure and Hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Meta-analysis of Gene Expression Signatures of Blood Pressure and Hypertension
Published in
PLoS Genetics, March 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianxiao Huan, Tõnu Esko, Marjolein J. Peters, Luke C. Pilling, Katharina Schramm, Claudia Schurmann, Brian H. Chen, Chunyu Liu, Roby Joehanes, Andrew D. Johnson, Chen Yao, Sai-xia Ying, Paul Courchesne, Lili Milani, Nalini Raghavachari, Richard Wang, Poching Liu, Eva Reinmaa, Abbas Dehghan, Albert Hofman, André G. Uitterlinden, Dena G. Hernandez, Stefania Bandinelli, Andrew Singleton, David Melzer, Andres Metspalu, Maren Carstensen, Harald Grallert, Christian Herder, Thomas Meitinger, Annette Peters, Michael Roden, Melanie Waldenberger, Marcus Dörr, Stephan B. Felix, Tanja Zeller, Ramachandran Vasan, Christopher J. O'Donnell, Peter J. Munson, Xia Yang, Holger Prokisch, Uwe Völker, Joyce B. J. van Meurs, Luigi Ferrucci, Daniel Levy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iceland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 265 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 19%
Professor 35 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 54 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 77 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,694,911
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#1,324
of 9,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,269
of 295,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#25
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.