↓ Skip to main content

Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control

Overview of attention for article published in Research Policy, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 2,587)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
132 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control
Published in
Research Policy, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.020
Authors

Christian Berggren, Solmaz Filiz Karabag

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 22 19%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Arts and Humanities 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 30 26%
Unknown 38 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#397,016
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Research Policy
#39
of 2,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,030
of 369,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Policy
#3
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.