↓ Skip to main content

Predictivism and old evidence: a critical look at climate model tuning

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal for Philosophy of Science, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Predictivism and old evidence: a critical look at climate model tuning
Published in
European Journal for Philosophy of Science, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13194-015-0110-4
Authors

Mathias Frisch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 36%
Arts and Humanities 2 9%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Philosophy 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,916,870
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#244
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,760
of 282,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them