↓ Skip to main content

Defining Ethnic and Racial Differences in Osteoporosis and Fragility Fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 7,310)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
Defining Ethnic and Racial Differences in Osteoporosis and Fragility Fractures
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11999-011-1863-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane A Cauley

Abstract

Osteoporotic fractures are a major public health issue. The literature suggests there are variations in occurrence of fractures by ethnicity and race.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 254 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 18%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 74 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 79 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 301. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#115,433
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#10
of 7,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337
of 127,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.