| Title |
Implication of mitochondria in the replication of Nodamura virus in larvae of the Lepidoptera,Galleria mellonella (L.) and in suckling mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Virology, September 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01316670 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Garzon, H. Strykowski, G. Charpentier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,159,890
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#327
of 4,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,579
of 15,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.