↓ Skip to main content

HIV status disclosure, depressive symptoms, and sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive young men who have sex with men

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
HIV status disclosure, depressive symptoms, and sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive young men who have sex with men
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10865-015-9624-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie H. Cook, Pamela Valera, Patrick A. Wilson, The Adolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions

Abstract

The rate of HIV infection among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) is increasing in the United States, and targeted research is needed to inform interventions aimed at reducing HIV transmission in this population. This study aims to understand the association between HIV status disclosure and sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive YMSM. A particular focus is given to depressive symptoms and their potential role in explaining the association between HIV disclosure and sexual risk behavior. In a sample of 991 YMSM receiving care at 20 clinics across the United States, Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore these associations. Approximately one-half (52.4 %) of participants reported disclosing to their current sexual/romantic partner. Disclosure to family members was negatively associated with sexual risk behavior. Also, depressive symptoms were positively associated with sexual risk behavior. We discuss the implications of our findings for future research and intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Researcher 11 9%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 39 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#13,744,219
of 24,518,979 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#702
of 1,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,463
of 265,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,518,979 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.