↓ Skip to main content

Sternalis muscle: an underestimated anterior chest wall anatomical variant

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Sternalis muscle: an underestimated anterior chest wall anatomical variant
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1749-8090-6-73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Athanasios Raikos, George K Paraskevas, Maria Tzika, Pedro Faustmann, Stefanos Triaridis, Panagiota Kordali, Panagiotis Kitsoulis, Beate Brand-Saberi

Abstract

Over the recent years, an increased alertness for thorough knowledge of anatomical variants with clinical significance has been recorded in order to minimize the risks of surgical complications. We report a rare case of bilateral strap-like sternalis muscle of the anterior chest wall in a female cadaver. Its presence may evoke alterations in the electrocardiogram or confuse a routine mammography. The incidental finding of a sternalis muscle in mammography, CT, and MRI studies must be documented in a patient's medical records as it can be used as a pedicle flap or flap microvascular anastomosis during reconstructive surgery of the anterior chest wall, head and neck, and breast. Moreover, its presence may be misdiagnosed as a wide range of benign and malignant anterior chest wall lesions and tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,219,838
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#281
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,928
of 110,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them