↓ Skip to main content

Attitudes and referral practices of maternity care professionals with regard to complementary and alternative medicine: an integrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Nursing, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attitudes and referral practices of maternity care professionals with regard to complementary and alternative medicine: an integrative review
Published in
Journal of Advanced Nursing, January 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05510.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon Adams, Chi‐Wai Lui, David Sibbritt, Alex Broom, Jon Wardle, Caroline Homer

Abstract

This paper presents an integrative literature review examining the attitudes and referral practices of midwives and other maternity care professionals with regard to complementary and alternative treatment and its use by pregnant women.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Lecturer 9 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 20%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Computer Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#5,578
of 5,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,927
of 190,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.