↓ Skip to main content

Improving the Accuracy of Cardiovascular Component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score*

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the Accuracy of Cardiovascular Component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score*
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000929
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hemang Yadav, Andrew M. Harrison, Andrew C. Hanson, Ognjen Gajic, Daryl J. Kor, Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba

Abstract

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score is an attractive risk prediction model because of its simplicity and graded assessment of morbidity and mortality. Due to changes in clinical practice over time, the cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score no longer accurately reflects current clinical practice. To address this limitation, we developed and validated a modified cardiovascular component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score that takes into account all vasoactive agents used in current clinical practice, uses shock index as a substitute for mean arterial pressure, and incorporates serum lactate as a biomarker for shock states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,827,766
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#1,987
of 9,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,955
of 277,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#33
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.