You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engineering a future for amphibians under climate change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01942.x |
| Authors |
Luke P. Shoo, Deanna H. Olson, Sarah K. McMenamin, Kris A. Murray, Monique Van Sluys, Maureen A. Donnelly, Danial Stratford, Juhani Terhivuo, Andres Merino‐Viteri, Sarah M. Herbert, Phillip J. Bishop, Paul Stephen Corn, Liz Dovey, Richard A. Griffiths, Katrin Lowe, Michael Mahony, Hamish McCallum, Jonathan D. Shuker, Clay Simpkins, Lee F. Skerratt, Stephen E. Williams, Jean‐Marc Hero |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 3% |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 379 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 82 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 13% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 236 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 101 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,634,365
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,020
of 4,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,553
of 193,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.