You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interspecific and Geographic Variation in the Diets of Sympatric Carnivores: Dingoes/Wild Dogs and Red Foxes in South-Eastern Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0120975 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naomi E. Davis, David M. Forsyth, Barbara Triggs, Charlie Pascoe, Joe Benshemesh, Alan Robley, Jenny Lawrence, Euan G. Ritchie, Dale G. Nimmo, Lindy F. Lumsden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 35 | 44% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 33 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 68% |
| Scientists | 20 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 21% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#575,563
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,834
of 224,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,835
of 279,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#169
of 6,087 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,087 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.