↓ Skip to main content

The smelling of Hedione results in sex-differentiated human brain activity

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The smelling of Hedione results in sex-differentiated human brain activity
Published in
NeuroImage, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Wallrabenstein, J. Gerber, S. Rasche, I. Croy, S. Kurtenbach, T. Hummel, H. Hatt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 85 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Other 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Neuroscience 14 15%
Psychology 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Chemistry 6 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#315,731
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#126
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,612
of 278,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#1
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.