↓ Skip to main content

Not so Sweet Revenge: Unanticipated Consequences of High-Intensity Sweeteners

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives on Behavior Science, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 552)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Not so Sweet Revenge: Unanticipated Consequences of High-Intensity Sweeteners
Published in
Perspectives on Behavior Science, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40614-015-0028-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E. Swithers

Abstract

While no single factor accounts for the significant increases in overweight and obesity that have emerged during the past several decades, evidence now suggests that sugars, in general, and sugar-sweetened beverages, in particular, may be especially problematic. One response to this concern has been an explosion in the availability and use of noncaloric sweeteners as replacements for sugar. While consumers have been led to believe that such substitutes are healthy, long-term epidemiological data in a number of cohorts have documented increased risk for negative outcomes like type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and stroke among users of artificial sweeteners. Experimental data from animals has provided several plausible mechanisms that could explain this counterintuitive relationship. In particular, my research has demonstrated that artificial sweeteners appear to interfere with basic learned, predictive relations between sweet tastes and post-ingestive consequences such as the delivery of energy. By interfering with these relations, artificial sweeteners inhibit anticipatory responses that normally serve to maintain physiological homeostasis, and over the long term, this interference could result in negative health effects like those seen in the human cohort studies. These data suggest that reducing the consumption of all sweeteners is advisable to promote better health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Psychology 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,306,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives on Behavior Science
#16
of 552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,381
of 274,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives on Behavior Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them