You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 7 years’ corrected age in preterm infants who were fed high-dose docosahexaenoic acid to term equivalent: a follow-up of a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007314 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carmel T Collins, Robert A Gibson, Peter J Anderson, Andrew J McPhee, Thomas R Sullivan, Jacqueline F Gould, Philip Ryan, Lex W Doyle, Peter G Davis, Judy E McMichael, Noel P French, Paul B Colditz, Karen Simmer, Scott A Morris, Maria Makrides |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 29% |
| Psychology | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,640,321
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#3,045
of 25,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,594
of 295,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#43
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.