You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors associated with damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205171 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian N Bruce, Aidan G O'Keeffe, Vern Farewell, John G Hanly, Susan Manzi, Li Su, Dafna D Gladman, Sang-Cheol Bae, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Daniel J Wallace, Ann E Clarke, Sasha Bernatsky, Ellen M Ginzler, David A Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Joan T Merrill, Graciela S Alarcón, Barri J Fessler, Paul R Fortin, Michelle Petri, Kristjan Steinsson, Mary Anne Dooley, Munther A Khamashta, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Asad A Zoma, Gunnar K Sturfelt, Ola Nived, Cynthia Aranow, Meggan Mackay, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Kenneth C Kalunian, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, Sam Lim, Diane L Kamen, Christine A Peschken, Murat Inanc, Murray B Urowitz |
| Abstract |
We studied damage accrual and factors determining development and progression of damage in an international cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 313 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 75 | 24% |
| Unknown | 78 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 150 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 95 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,620,649
of 24,589,002 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#986
of 7,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,158
of 232,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#14
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,589,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.