| Title |
Toothless wildlife protection laws
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-015-0914-8 |
| Authors |
José Vicente López-Bao, Juan Carlos Blanco, Alejandro Rodríguez, Raquel Godinho, Víctor Sazatornil, Francisco Alvares, Emilio J. García, Luis Llaneza, Miguel Rico, Yolanda Cortés, Vicente Palacios, Guillaume Chapron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 84% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#971,039
of 25,492,047 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#110
of 2,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,118
of 277,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,492,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.