| Title |
Economic impacts of climate change on water resources in the coterminous United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11027-013-9483-x |
| Authors |
James Henderson, Charles Rodgers, Russell Jones, Joel Smith, Kenneth Strzepek, Jeremy Martinich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 27% |
| Engineering | 16 | 19% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,685,528
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#452
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,078
of 201,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.