↓ Skip to main content

Dabigatran in the peri-procedural period for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and impact on duration of hospital stay

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Dabigatran in the peri-procedural period for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and impact on duration of hospital stay
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10840-013-9801-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimitake Imamura, Akihiro Yoshida, Asumi Takei, Koji Fukuzawa, Kunihiko Kiuchi, Kaoru Takami, Mitsuru Takami, Mitsuaki Itoh, Ryudo Fujiwara, Atsushi Suzuki, Tomoyuki Nakanishi, Soichiro Yamashita, Akinori Matsumoto, Ken-ichi Hirata

Abstract

Dabigatran is effective for both the prevention of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the safety and efficacy of the use of dabigatran in the peri-procedural period for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of AF is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dabigatran in the peri-procedural period for RFCA of AF and the duration of hospital stay.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 29 25%